As Developing Cyclone Melissa swirled off the coast of Haiti, meteorologist Philippe Papin felt certain it was about to escalate to a major tropical system.
Serving as primary meteorologist on duty, he forecasted that in a single day the weather system would intensify into a severe hurricane and begin a turn towards the Jamaican shoreline. Not a single expert had previously made this confident prediction for quick intensification.
But, Papin possessed a secret advantage: artificial intelligence in the form of the tech giant’s recently introduced DeepMind cyclone prediction system – launched for the initial occasion in June. And, as predicted, Melissa did become a system of astonishing strength that ravaged Jamaica.
Forecasters are increasingly leaning hard on Google DeepMind. During 25 October, Papin explained in his public discussion that Google’s model was a primary reason for his confidence: “Roughly 40/50 Google DeepMind simulation runs show Melissa becoming a most intense hurricane. Although I am unprepared to predict that intensity yet due to path variability, that is still plausible.
“There is a high probability that a period of rapid intensification is expected as the storm drifts over exceptionally hot ocean waters which represent the highest oceanic heat content in the entire Atlantic basin.”
Google DeepMind is the first AI model dedicated to hurricanes, and now the first to beat standard weather forecasters at their own game. Through all 13 Atlantic storms so far this year, Google’s model is top-performing – surpassing experts on path forecasts.
Melissa ultimately struck in Jamaica at category 5 intensity, among the most powerful landfalls recorded in nearly two centuries of data collection across the region. Papin’s bold forecast likely gave people in Jamaica additional preparation time to get ready for the catastrophe, possibly saving lives and property.
The AI system works by identifying trends that traditional lengthy scientific weather models may overlook.
“The AI performs far faster than their traditional counterparts, and the processing requirements is more affordable and time consuming,” said Michael Lowry, a ex forecaster.
“This season’s events has demonstrated in short order is that the recent artificial intelligence systems are on par with and, in certain instances, more accurate than the less rapid traditional forecasting tools we’ve relied upon,” he added.
To be sure, the system is an instance of AI training – a technique that has been used in research fields like weather science for years – and is not creative artificial intelligence like ChatGPT.
Machine learning takes mounds of data and pulls out patterns from them in a such a way that its model only takes a few minutes to come up with an answer, and can operate on a desktop computer – in strong contrast to the flagship models that governments have utilized for years that can require many hours to process and need the largest supercomputers in the world.
Still, the fact that the AI could exceed earlier gold-standard traditional systems so rapidly is truly remarkable to weather scientists who have spent their careers trying to predict the most intense weather systems.
“It’s astonishing,” said James Franklin, a retired expert. “The data is now large enough that it’s pretty clear this is not just beginner’s luck.”
Franklin noted that while the AI is outperforming all other models on predicting the trajectory of storms worldwide this year, like many AI models it sometimes errs on high-end intensity forecasts wrong. It struggled with another storm previously, as it was similarly experiencing rapid intensification to maximum intensity north of the Caribbean.
During the next break, Franklin stated he intends to discuss with the company about how it can enhance the DeepMind output even more helpful for experts by providing additional internal information they can use to evaluate the reasons it is producing its answers.
“The one thing that troubles me is that while these forecasts seem to be really, really good, the results of the model is kind of a opaque process,” said Franklin.
There has never been a commercial entity that has developed a top-level forecasting system which allows researchers a view of its methods – in contrast to nearly all other models which are offered free to the public in their full form by the authorities that created and operate them.
The company is not alone in starting to use AI to solve difficult meteorological problems. The US and European governments are developing their own artificial intelligence systems in the development phase – which have demonstrated better performance over earlier non-AI versions.
Future developments in artificial intelligence predictions seem to be new firms tackling previously tough-to-solve problems such as sub-seasonal outlooks and improved advance warnings of tornado outbreaks and sudden deluges – and they are receiving US government funding to pursue this. A particular firm, WindBorne Systems, is even launching its proprietary weather balloons to address deficiencies in the national monitoring system.